Which is better?

Posts here will show on front page

Which is better?

Muir Valley
24
23%
PMRP
79
77%
 
Total votes: 103

User avatar
ray
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 840
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 10:48 am
Location: Lexington, KY

Which is better?

Post by ray » Mon May 27, 2013 8:12 pm

Which is better overall for a climbing area? From rock quality to atmosphere.

mcrib
(from the board)
Posts: 1096
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 3:17 pm
Location: Flexington, Ky

Re: Which is better?

Post by mcrib » Mon May 27, 2013 8:16 pm

PMRP = Private Matt and Ray Penetration? what could be better than that?
"I just want to disappear"

allah
Went Down On It
Posts: 1443
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 12:10 am

Re: Which is better?

Post by allah » Mon May 27, 2013 8:40 pm

Only if I could vote for both, they mean the same to me in both quality and atmosphere. So no vote for me

Femslalomskier
Gumby
Gumby
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:58 pm

Re: Which is better?

Post by Femslalomskier » Mon May 27, 2013 10:01 pm

Silly poll really.

xylene2301
Gumby
Gumby
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 7:12 am

Re: Which is better?

Post by xylene2301 » Mon May 27, 2013 10:05 pm

Great routes at both but nothing equals contributions that the Webers have made to rock climbing by opening their home, Muir Valley, to the climbing community.
Time flies like an arrow and fruit flies like a bananna.

KD
Pooparazzo
Posts: 3163
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 9:21 pm
Location: Under the sky so blue

Re: Which is better?

Post by KD » Mon May 27, 2013 10:08 pm

abstain :)

THB
Official Nerd Notes Expert
Official Nerd Notes Expert
Posts: 273
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:26 am
Location: Lexington, KY

Re: Which is better?

Post by THB » Mon May 27, 2013 10:35 pm

This question is totally biased!

I also abstain.

dustonian
BANNED
Posts: 3089
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 10:46 am
Location: Lex/Zoe

Re: Which is better?

Post by dustonian » Mon May 27, 2013 10:44 pm

Wow, what a stupid poll.

hamsco
Brokeback Hammon
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 9:16 pm
Location: Zoe, Ky
Contact:

Re: Which is better?

Post by hamsco » Mon May 27, 2013 11:07 pm

You gotta be kidding me.
No creeds, manuals, or special translations

the lurkist
In Crust We Trust
Posts: 2244
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 10:07 am

Re: Which is better?

Post by the lurkist » Mon May 27, 2013 11:45 pm

What's better is having an involved community supporting FOMV and the RRGCC.
"It really is all good ! My thinking only occasionally calls it differently..."
Normie

falling!!!!
Gumby
Gumby
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 9:09 pm

Re: Which is better?

Post by falling!!!! » Mon May 27, 2013 11:48 pm

I abstain on the vote because the option I would choose is unavailable. I would say they are equal. The Webers/FOMV and the RRGCC take different approaches to land management and route development. I believe that both are reasonable and there is no reason one has to be better than the other, just different. Really, what is better than getting to go out do the things we like?
JJ

dustonian
BANNED
Posts: 3089
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 10:46 am
Location: Lex/Zoe

Re: Which is better?

Post by dustonian » Mon May 27, 2013 11:51 pm

falling!!!! wrote:I abstain on the vote because the option I would choose is unavailable. I would say they are equal. The Webers/FOMV and the RRGCC take different approaches to land management and route development. I believe that both are reasonable and there is no reason one has to be better than the other, just different. Really, what is better than getting to go out do the things we like?
JJ
the lurkist wrote:What's better is having an involved community supporting FOMV and the RRGCC.
Right on, gentlemen.

lena_chita
Poser
Poser
Posts: 347
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 5:48 pm

Re: Which is better?

Post by lena_chita » Tue May 28, 2013 7:27 am

falling!!!! wrote:I abstain on the vote because the option I would choose is unavailable. I would say they are equal. The Webers/FOMV and the RRGCC take different approaches to land management and route development. I believe that both are reasonable and there is no reason one has to be better than the other, just different. Really, what is better than getting to go out do the things we like?
JJ
What would be better is if the two entities worked more cooperatively.

Until then, I am voting for the Zoo as the better one.

Seriously though, when people think of going climbing to the Red, they think of THE RED-- and that includes Muir Valley, and PMRP, and Natural Bridge, and those weird Northern regions where people stick funny-shaped gear pieces into the cracks.

User avatar
ray
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 840
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 10:48 am
Location: Lexington, KY

Re: Which is better?

Post by ray » Tue May 28, 2013 12:24 pm

There you have it Rick. You can now sleep better knowing that the bizarre competition you've created in your mind is only in your mind.

User avatar
clif
Loser
Loser
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 5:24 pm

Re: Which is better?

Post by clif » Tue May 28, 2013 12:49 pm

i think my cat voted twice
training is for people who care, i have a job.

Post Reply